Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Monstrosities of Female Sexuality Within the Jewish Imagination

Hey ya'll, here is my final for Murray. As always, any sort of feedback is welcome.

See you Wednesday,
Becky


~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Within the Jewish imagination, monsters like dybbuks and golems represent cultural fantasies. The basic plot of the Jewish monster story goes like this: The monster arrives to a community, makes the community believe that the Messiah has arrived, and then destroys the community's hope that they will ever be saved. In Cynthia Ozick's The Puttermesser Papers, Ruth metaphorically births the golem Xanthippe, who in turn brings peace to New York City and then destroys it with her ferocious appetite for sex. Similarly, Leah leaves her family and community behind to enter the Holy Land with Khonon in S. Ansky's play The Dybbuk. Though the names are different, the stories remain the same: in both texts, sexuality is a key component to the downfall of the characters. More specifically, feminine sexuality is construed as monstrous. The monsters of these texts seem to be a metaphor for something surrounding sexuality, although the metaphor is a bit unclear. Are the purpose of these monsters to create a sense of fear about feminine sexuality? And if so, is this because sexuality is portrayed as a source of profound power? Or, is sexuality really monstrous because lust is a sin, and are these characters experiencing trials and tribulations because they cannot control themselves? If this is the case, what exactly do the Jews have to fear?

Ozick's Ruth Puttermesser is a quietly powerful woman. She is well-educated, well-read, and thinks highly of herself. She is good at her job at the Department of Receipts and Disbursements; however, her bosses do not intend on ever giving her the raise she deserves. But even though Ruth is better than her working conditions, she opts to stay: "The difficulty with Puttermesser is that she is loyal to certain environments" (Ozick 12). Though Ruth does not outrightly state that she is unhappy with her life, it can be assumed that -- because she is so well-educated -- she knows she is overworked and underappreciated. Her complacency in the face of her work environment leads one to believe that Ruth has low self-worth. It seems odd that someone with her intelligence and talents does not strive for something greater than a job that involves little more than a lot of paper-pushing. The fact that she stays at her job shows that Ruth defines herself through her intelligence and her work identity. This is made especially clear when she writes a letter to Mayor Mavett about her demotion (Ozick 33-34). She sees this demotion as an enormous insult because she takes her job much more seriously than any of her coworkers. The loss of Ruth's title signifies a loss of control over her own life.

Without her work identity, the only way she defines herself is by her intelligence, specifically, by the books she reads. Ruth constantly reads, describing her Eden as a place where she can sit under a tree, eat chocolates, and read library books without the burden of overdue fines (Ozick 13-14). Reading for Ruth is a personal act that she does not share with many people, and with good reason. When she does share her love of literature, she is mocked and misunderstood, as seen when Rappoport leaves Ruth in the middle of the night after she refuses to put down Theaetetus (Ozick 24). Reading essentially gives Ruth a purpose in life, so when others cannot seem to understand why she loves it, it devalues her sense of identity. This makes Ruth seem weak: her sense of self exists in fiction where it cannot be understood or appreciated by the important people in her life.

In this way, Ruth has no agency or control over her life. She halfheartedly attempts to gain some control by vowing to grow plants in her apartment; she has an almost desperate need to be "responsible for life" and get rid of her self-proclaimed "black thumb" (Ozick 26). Instead of taking control of her own life, she invests all her energy into her plants. This is perhaps because she is afraid to revitalize her own life, which corresponds with the notion that she has no agency.

Ultimately, though, her apartment's plants do not give her a sense of purpose. Though Ruth attempts to defy Jewish woman stereotypes by never marrying and working for a higher education, she cannot come to terms with the fact that she is childless: "Sometimes the thought that she would never give birth tore her heart" (Ozick 36). This sentence is positioned in between two paragraphs about her job, showing how determined Ruth is to avoid feeling unaccomplished and lonely. Her refusal to reveal her vulnerability shows how image-conscious she is; Ruth does not want to seem like a failure.

In many ways, Ruth's childlessness desexualizes and shames her. It advertises an image of Ruth as a spinster, and within the Jewish culture, this image is somewhat ignominious. Indeed, Ruth's refusal to reconcile her childlessness shows that she, at least on some level, realizes this. Perhaps this sense of shame associated with her failure to marry and reproduce is what causes Ruth's lack of agency in the first place. This implies again that Ruth has low self-worth, which is somewhat ironic considering Ruth shows that, by staying single and working at a law office, she fights hard to defy the stereotypes set against her by her Jewish community. Regardless of her accomplishments, though, Ruth is a minority; her possibilities to reach for more are limited. This means that she cannot balance her current life with a husband and a child. For Ruth, life with a child exists only as a fantasy.

When Ruth creates Xanthippe, she creates an agent of change. It is no coincidence that Ruth uses the dirt from her potted plants to shape Xanthippe; when the plants do not provide Ruth with a sense of control, they are traded in for something of an upgrade. Unlike the plants, Xanthippe's body acts like a vessel for Ruth's hopes and dreams. Simply, Xanthippe represents Ruth's agency. She is more than just a manifestation of Ruth's desires to have a child; Ruth's imagined offspring is a "self-lov[ing]" version of herself as a child (Ozick 36). When Ruth looks at Xanthippe, she only sees an ugly, obtrusive, irritating "thief of the earth" (Ozick 40), which is the antithesis of Ruth wants her child to be. One may deduce, however, that Xanthippe is the true image Ruth has of herself. Ruth asserts earlier that she "believe[s] in the uses of fantasy: 'A person should see himself or herself everywhere. All things manifest us'" (Ozick 36). With this notion in mind, Ruth implies that she made Xanthippe as a reflection of herself. This corresponds with the idea that Ruth secretly has a low opinion of herself. At the same time, Xanthippe is a hopeful message that says Ruth knows she is capable of changing her life.

Xanthippe is Ruth's agent of force, power, and fantasy. She takes Ruth's dreams of running for mayor and turns them into reality (Ozick 70), thus earning Ruth the respect she always deserved. Unfortunately for Ruth, all good things eventually come to an end. The downfall of her golem, Ruth believes, happens when Xanthippe realizes her appetite for sex. When Xanthippe stops paying attention to Ruth's politics and instead starts sleeping with Rappoport, the Eden that she helped Ruth create starts to revert back to its old ways: the crime rate returns, the Department of Sanitation stops cleaning the streets, and the general collective unhappiness of New York City's citizens returns (Ozick 86). This city-wide relapse represents Ruth losing control over her agent of power. The difference between Ruth's former and present life is that her new position of power causes the whole city to suffer; before winning office, Ruth's lack of agency was a personal problem. Because of the golem, Ruth's private plights become public affairs. Her struggles to control Xanthippe affect the entire city, which in many ways hurts the community more than if she had never been in office at all. Ruth shows New York's citizens what their community would look like as a utopia, only to almost immediately destroy it and ruin any hope the community had of living in a harmonic haven. Her stint in office is basically a grand scale version of tempting a small child with candy and then eating it in front of his face: the child is worse off than he would have been if he had never been shown the candy at all. Ruth blames Xanthippe and implies that Xanthippe caused this destruction and disappointment within the community, but ultimately Ruth is at fault because she cannot control her agency.

In a sense, though, perhaps Ruth fails to control Xanthippe because she has no real grounds to act upon. She claims that Xanthippe loses focus when she starts sleeping around. However, before Xanthippe's sexuality blossoms, Ruth says that Xanthippe spends her days milling around the city and returns to the mayor's mansion with relatively prosaic ideas to improve the community (Ozick 78). Ruth only starts to resent Xanthippe's uselessness when Xanthippe starts having sex. This shows that the real reason Ruth attempts to punish Xanthippe is because she is afraid of the power Xanthippe will discover once she begins to understand her sexuality. Ruth's horrified reaction to her golem's sex life perhaps parallels the Jewish community's reaction to Ruth's lifestyle choices. Just like Xanthippe, Ruth steps outside the boundaries set by her community to make something new and unexpected of herself. With Ruth's character, this effort is construed as noble and gallant. It makes her Jewish community look oppressive for setting boundaries in the first place. But when Xanthippe acts in the same fashion, Ruth reprimands her. Ruth, then, goes from being the oppressed to the oppressor. This shift shows that Ruth cannot fully escape from the boundaries within the Jewish community. She retains this mentality that women are supposed to act a certain way; by wanting Xanthippe to fulfill this stereotype, she takes two steps backwards as a liberated Jewish woman.

This brings into question if one can ever really leave their community. It seems that if one does opt to leave, mass destruction is eminent: the downfall of New York stands as a motif of punishment for escaping. Ruth's failure to mayor New York City shows that attempting to shake the foundation of a community is ultimately detrimental. In essence, Ruth betrays her Jewish community, so why should she be allowed to successfully forge a new life in New York? The golem is not the source of Ruth's problems. Rather, Ruth's golem is a manifestation of the monster that lives inside Ruth's consciousness. The monstrousness of the golem represents the part of Ruth that thought it was acceptable to leave her Jewish community behind.

On the other side of the coin, it is wildly unfair and unrealistic to expect one's identity to exist strictly within one community. Ansky explores these ideas in The Dybbuk with Leah and Khonon's star-crossed romance. The subtitle of this play is "Between Two Worlds," which very accurately defines Leah and Khonon's relationship. The conflict in this play begins when Sender does not allow his daughter to take Khonon's hand in marriage; Sender wants Leah to be married off to a rich man (Ansky 17). Sender's wish presents Khonon with an impossible obstacle to overcome -- he will never make enough money to satisfy Sender -- but Khonon thinks he can get over his feelings by immersing himself in Kabbalah: "Which sin is the hardest to conquer? The sin of lust for a woman..." (Ansky 14). Khonon delves deep into his Jewish identity to find the answers to his problems, which is ironic and arguably unproductive because the standards of his Jewish community created his problems in the first place.

In a way, though, Khonon's study of Kabbalah provides him a form of escape. He calls the Talmud "cold and dry" and then "speaks with animation" about his love of Kabbalah (Ansky 12). According to Khonon, there is "another world" that waits to be discovered. On the surface, he appears to be talking about his spirituality. A deeper reading, however, shows that his intentions are to leave his current world completely. In his present state, Khonon is unhappy. Concurrently, his Jewish peers live by the Talmud. Khonon's need to move beyond the Talmud shows that he already exists on a plane separate from his community. By expressing a keen interest in Kabbalah, Khonon principally leaves his Jewish community at the very beginning of the play.

Regardless of this, Khonon still tries to maintain a good relationship within his milieu of Jews. Even in his rant against the Talmud, he remembers to stay diplomatic: he calls it "profound" and "sublime"; its only problem is that it "shackles you to the earth" (Ansky 13). Assuming the Talmud represents Khonon's community, this statement means Khonon loves and appreciates his community but wants to move beyond it. Like Ruth, Khonon's possibilities are limited within his Jewish sphere. Technically, Kabbalah is an extension of this sphere, but it "tears the soul from its earthly bonds" (Ansky 13). If it exists outside the earth, it therefore exists outside Khonon's current Jewish world.

When Khonon's spirit enters Leah's body, he literally does remove himself from his "earthly bonds." Although this move is huge and bold, it is not exactly a complete move out of his community. Leah is still very much immersed in her Jewish identity as it exists within the community, so even though his body is liberated, Khonon enters a new body that is just as "shackled." In this way, his spirit is not completely free from the confines of his community. Though Khonon never gives an explanation for this move, one can assume that he chooses to enter Leah's body because he is in love with her. While this is, on some level, very romantic, it is also very invasive and highly presumptuous to assume that Leah would appreciate Khonon taking up residence inside of her. His actions are a metaphor for rape, which forces the audience to question Khonon's spiritual and personal integrity. In turn, the audience must question Khonon's decision to leave his community. If he must rape the woman he loves in order to release his shackles, then the end does not justify the means.

In order to understand Khonon's motives, his feelings about Kabbalah must be examined through a Freudian lens. When he discusses Kabbalah with Henekh, the stage directions show that Khonon's excitement slowly builds. He becomes "suddenly alert" and then "animated," (Ansky 12), showing that his interest piques when someone mentions Kabbalah. When Khonon finally addresses Kabbalah directly, he speaks "ecstatically" and his lines are punctuated with exclamation points. Then, he suddenly "falls" and says his "strength...fail[s]" him (Ansky 13). In short, this scene seems to show Khonon experience a spiritual orgasm.

This sexualizes Khonon's relationship to Kabbalah, but this does not make him blasphemous or impure. Rather, this reading connects the importance of asserting sexuality within spirituality. When Khonon relates the most profound level of Judaism to an orgasm, it implies that there is huge power in sexuality. Within the Jewish culture, there is a stigma against people who act on their sexual feelings. Ruth's treatment of Xanthippe and Khonon's notion of lust as the worst sin are prime examples of how sexual perceptions within the Jewish culture are, put simply, bad. Khonon's understanding of Kabbalah shows that there is a need to explore the connection between the physical and the spiritual. Khonon's spiritual rape of Leah, then, frees Leah from her similar "earthly bonds" (namely, her arranged marriage) and allows her to discover a whole new realm of her Judaism.

Ruth never reaches the spiritual nirvana that Khonon and Leah find together at the end of their play. This may be because she never comes to terms with her sexual agency. Khonon uses Leah's body to carry them into the Holy Land. In essence, Leah's body is a container for agency. Xanthippe's body serves a similar function: it holds Ruth's political power and sexual fantasy. These similarities shows the importance of the female body in relation to power and agency. Arguably, women are the oldest group of oppressed minorities, so perhaps feminine power derives from their experience living within the margin. Additionally, the Jews are also pushed into the margin, so Jewish women can be seen as a double minority. Power within the margins often stems from the oppressed people's anger. In this vein, it makes sense that the Jewish female body is the most powerful agent in these two texts.

On a superficial level, the destruction of New York City in The Puttermesser Papers looks like a result of the golem's sexual appetite. But by considering the city in relation to Leah's body as a vessel, it becomes clear that peace in New York ends because Ruth does not come to terms with her own sexual appetite. Ruth has no agency because she refuses to let sex permeate her life. Judging by her treatment of Xanthippe, Ruth seems to be afraid of sex. This further shows that Ruth is afraid of her own potential power. It also shows that she is not completely comfortable with her identity as a woman. Unfortunately for Ruth, she cannot take control of her life until she learns to use her sexuality as an agent. Her golem tries to show her the way, but Ruth resists. As a result, her life collapses; she cannot redefine herself outside her Jewish community. Leah and Khonon's move to the Holy Land shows that the only way to completely remove oneself from one's community is to explore one's sexual identity.

Feminine sexuality is accused of being monstrous in these texts because it is a form of escapism and an agent of change. When sexuality is explored within the Jewish community, it disrupts the balance of power. The Jews associate female sexuality with shame and guilt in order to police the boundaries of their community. That way, the community members will not discover their complete identities and thus decide to leave. The Jews believe that their community should wait for the Messiah together, but when people start exploring identities outside of their Jewish one, they discover their own forms of exile. As a minority group, the Jews need to keep as many of their people as possible in order to retain any sort of leverage over the hegemony. However, by denying the existence of sexuality in their culture, they dig themselves deeper into oppression.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

A Message of Encouragement

Colleagues --

I thought it appropriate for our last Nextbook meeting on December 10th to discuss

several topics.

Front and center, of course, will be a conversation about Angels in

America -- I anticipate that will lead into a general discussion of Monsters of the Jewish

Imagination, the overarching theme of the course.

I hope that will also offer an opportunity

for us to share our favorite passages from the readings -- whether or not they feature monsters --

and also to hear what some of these passages sound in languages different from English

that you've translated them into.

I also want to take this opportunity to tell you it's been a pleasure to conduct our discussions

and hope they will lead you to continue reading -- even more intensely and thoughtfully than

you've already been doing.

Be well

Murray

Friday, November 7, 2008

metamorphosis by kafka

I felt that people are so exposed to horror everyday that something as dramatic as changing into a verminous creature was just another event that they had to deal with in life.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Metamorphosis--a couple of important points...

One, was the question of how we deal with the things we don't really want to do and relegate them to "One" rather than "I". (p.114) Gregor seemed have realized how much we tolerate by ascribing it to "one"--as in "One hates the way this country's being run, but what is one to do about it?" (A lovely cop-out and definitely not on our agenda as Jews--one hopes!) As an animal now, he seems to be dealing with this and I thought he even rather enjoyed his "deluded" (p.60) animal state because it freed him up from the constraints of being human. "The animal is closer to us than man. That is the cage. Relationships are easier with animals than with men." (p. 107)
The main theme of the novela, for me, was Gregor's own state of alienation from himself. He hated his life as a salesman, could barely communicate with his own family--"he locks them out as much as they lock him in." (p. 72)
Being an animal allowed him to act instinctively rather than continuing to be weighed down with all the facts of his life which he hated; and in Kafka's own life, to the point of contemplating suicide.

~Lovene

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Il Ghetto: Forging Italian Jewish Identities: 1516 - 1870

























The Museo ItaloAmericano in San Francisco will host this exciting exhibit
from September 25, 2008 to February 15, 2009.


For more information, please visit the Museo ItaloAmericano Web site


Friday, October 24, 2008

Spirits in the Material World

I just read the following comment on Nextbook in a review of Dybbuks and Jewish Women in Social History, Mysticism, and Folklore by Rachel Elior

Elior argues that for women, dybbuks could be a means to escape the demands of a confining society. Once possessed by a dybbuk (or at least claiming to be), women were no longer considered responsible for their own actions, and were exempt from arranged marriages and relieved of wifely duties. Thought to be the souls of sinners, these spirits gave a certain degree of power to the powerless, freeing them from the norms of routine life and its conventional ordering.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

“Israeli Literature as a Window to Israeli Society” with Merav Rozenblum

Hello friends,

Per the request of Jane-Rachel Schonbrun, I'm posting this information regarding an adult class at Congregation Beth Am in Los Altos Hills which may be of interest:

This course of study offers a fresh and fascinating examination of Israeli society since the birth of the State in 1948. Through the pens of its leading writers, participants have an encounter with Israeli society that is original, contemporary, honest and proud. Reflections of the mythic Israel are matched by poetry and prose that is challenging and self-critical, and both offer profound insight into the Israeli national psyche.

Merav Rozenblum has been teaching adults for 15 years in a variety of settings including: the USF Ulpan program, several JCC’s in the Bay Area, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and in Moscow and Madrid. Merav also established The Hebrew Short Story Club in San Francisco.

Melton brings you this one-of-a-kind in-depth learning opportunity, presented in an interactive and pluralistic way! Gift yourself the gift of two hours a week for intellectual stimulation and personal growth!

Dates: Mondays, October 27-January 12 (no class 12/22 or 12/29)

Time: 7:00-8:45 PM

Location: Congregation Beth Am in Los Altos Hills

Fee: $200

Register: www.paloaltojcc.org/melton

For more information contact Jane-Rachel Schonbrun at (650) 852-3502 or jschonbrun@paloaltojcc.org.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Satan in Goray: pp. 154-5

Murray thought it might be helpful if I posted a part of an email correspondence we had about Satan in Goray, so here we go!



At our last discussion, we talked about the possibility of Rechele's visions and her deteriorating health being physical manifestations of her traumatizing past. In the chapter titled "Rechele Prophesies," on pages 154 to 155, she has a vision that the Angel Sandalfon visits her and tells her to spread the good word about Reb Gedaliya. The part of the passage I liked begins with, "All night the voice called to Rechele..." and ends with, "...she fell face forward on the earth."

The most interesting part about this passage is how Singer focuses on Rechele's body and her physical reactions to this vision. In essence, Rechele becomes a living soul trapped in a corpse's body. It's like she can only experience these visions when her body is on the "edge of death" (154). Similarly, Rechele only relays Angel Sandalfon's message in the prayer-house court after she falls on the ground as if she has died. I think that Rechele's physical weakness correlates with the broader conflict of the novel: the downfall of Goray. Rechele's dybbuk only ever comes out when she is weakened -- essentially, when she has no voice of her own. Similarly, the citizens of Goray are down and out from the Polish attacks. They are looking for someone to save them. When Reb Gedaliya comes to town, they submit to him basically without question, and I think it's because they feel like they were not powerful enough on their own to save themselves.

By the end of the novel, it's made clear that Reb Gedaliya took advantage of his power and of the Goray citizens. I think, then, that it's safe to assume Reb Gedaliya took advantage of Rechele as well. From the very beginning of the novel, Rechele is described as physically weak because she has a limp; essentially, she seems like a woman just waiting to be victimized. It is already suspicious for Reb Gedaliya to marry Rechele a week after her divorce is finalized. Early on, it seems like he has ulterior motives. When Rechele gets sicker and starts having visions, Reb Gedaliya jumps at the opportunity to turn these visions into prophecies that highlight him as a savior. It seems pretty diabolic.

In this passage, Rechele's visits from Angel Sandalfon seem like a horrible nightmare, nothing like the holy visions Reb Gedaliya constructs for the people of Goray. Singer mostly remarks the physical pains Rechele feels through the night, making these visions look like physical abuse. In fact, after Rechele wakes up, she "rinse[s] her breasts and thighs as though performing a ritual" (154). What type of ritual, though, is never specified. Because she never identifies a purpose to this ritual, it opens the floor for debate about what this purpose could be. To me, it seems as though she is cleaning herself after having sex.

Rechele, however, is a supposed virgin, so this does not make sense. But, based on the fact that Reb Gedaliya proves himself to be untrustworthy and manipulative, I deduced that he's possibly raping her when she is too weak to stop it or maybe even realize it. In the beginning of the novel, her Granny fills her head with scary ghost stories that leave Rechele convinced that every bad thing that happens in life is the result of an evil spirit inhabiting her space. Perhaps, then, Rechele is displacing her traumas caused by Reb Gedaliya. She could be blaming these physical pains on a dybbuk when really they're being inflicted by Reb Gedaliya, who in turn is making his actions into something holy.

Rechele seems to be looking for something to blame to cope with her physical and emotional state. The easiest thing for her is to blame a spirit that she cannot control. This parallels the attitudes of Goray and everyone's need to find a scapegoat for their problems. It's like the people of Goray blame their degradations on black magic and evil spirits because they can't deal with the reality that there are bad people within their community that will take advantage of them. It brings into question this whole definition of "magic" and makes me wonder if these people just insert meaning into this unspecific entity because they can't figure out a way to solve their problems. It seems like the people of Goray only believe in magic when it's convenient, i.e. when they need something to point their fingers at or something new to believe in. I'm not sure how holy or real Rechele's experiences with her dybbuk are when she doesn't seem to have much of an emotional reaction to them. Also, I wonder if the people of Goray can make her experience into something more real by inserting their meanings into it, or if that just falsifies it more.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Central Passages for Satan in Goray

Choose a passage of ten lines or so from the beginning of the second part of Satan in Goray-- type it in, and then in a couple of sentences tell us why it's central to the novel's main themes and issues.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Night vs. day--consciousness and cognition

Here's a question for discussion: where is your identity at night while you are sleeping? what is your identity during the day?

Lilith

"The rabbis, God-fearing and perfect souls, have often warned Itche Mates to cease his practices--for one must warn the culprit before punishing him. But he mocks in his heart the utterances of the righteous. He howls like a hound with his mouth, and finds a hundred and fifty arguments with which to declare the unclean clean.; but in secret he clings to Satan and Lilith, and offers up sacrifices to them. To demons he doth sacrifice, not to the living God." (Singer, Satan in Goray, p. 90-91).

Carl Sagan

"The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

This quote, widely attributed to Carl Sagan, speaks volumes regarding the overwhelming mysteries of our human existence: that if you are unaware of what you don't know, it is impossible to firmly declare a full understanding of the known world.

But on the flip side, in The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, Sagan "cites disturbing tendencies among most people to believe poorly supported ideas, and to fail to develop the faculty of critical thinking. He notes that polls indicate that large numbers of Americans believe that astrology is valid and that aliens in UFO's visit Earth regularly and abduct people. Students here, he tells us, are frighteningly ignorant of science. He discusses a psychic hoax set up by James Randi, which fooled large crowds and much of the news media in Australia before Randi revealed that he had set it up to test people's gullibility. He also gives accounts of horrible delusions of the past; his history of persecution of "witches" is brief but frightening. " (McGrath, Gary, 1999).

In an ironic juxtaposition, the above quote is also attributed to Donald Rumsfeld in his argument that there was no reason to conclude that there were no ties between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein just because evidence of these ties could not be established. Interesting how this notion can suddenly take on unexpected meaning...and startling implications. But does this make it less valid?